|
|
Post by Stan Butler on Jul 9, 2007 14:47:50 GMT
Now I wouldn't mind her as the new companion! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Master Shake on Jul 10, 2007 2:43:49 GMT
Excellent overall, although I thought the Christmas episode was a little silly. Big red female spider wants to feed human dosed on old alien dust (sort of) to her children who are literally the centre of the earth, along with much shouting by the annoying bride. After about ten minutes I was ready to slap her.I'm now not looking forward to series 4. Apparantly Catherine Tate's bride character is to become the next full time companion of the doctor (well for half the series at least). Big mistake I say! I agree. Though the anorak in me will tell you the Bride was called Donna. Let's hope she calms down before she becomes a full time character. I also agree about Kylie. |
|
|
|
Post by Grimly Fiendish on Jul 10, 2007 15:21:51 GMT
I don't think I can stand Catherine Tate for a whole series >.< Oh well. Bring back John Barrowman as the full time companion, I say! *drools slightly*
|
|
|
|
Post by The Collector on Jul 10, 2007 20:59:52 GMT
I wonder if Apart from Her Agent and Herself ANYONE is pleased Ms. Tate becoming Companion?
|
|
|
|
Post by Grimly Fiendish on Jul 15, 2007 13:36:26 GMT
Gingers? Like, ginger power or something?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Collector on Jul 15, 2007 14:27:09 GMT
Hmm...Maybe mick hucknell! (Arse)
|
|
|
|
Post by Master Shake on Jul 15, 2007 20:38:36 GMT
I've noticed in the new series (including the Catherine Tate ep), we've now seen 3 eps (Last night was Shakespeare) and the Doctor has mentioned Rose in each one so far at least once. Last night Martha looked well PO'd when he mentioned her.
Was the Doctor always so emotionally attatched to his companions after they left?
|
|
|
|
Post by Lieutenant Columbo on Jul 16, 2007 8:26:25 GMT
Nope... but get used to it..; he mopes about her all through practically!  N. |
|
|
|
Post by The Collector on Jul 16, 2007 11:44:07 GMT
not as much as this version, it was rare for a previous companion to get more than a brief mention at...say..regeneration times. Other than that can't think of too many examples.
|
|
Dance Commander
Audience Member
Down With Monarchy, Up With Anarchy!
Posts: 345
|
Post by Dance Commander on Jul 21, 2007 15:33:47 GMT
I think it's stupid how they've made it so that the companions, both Rose and Martha, were in love with the Doctor. Since when has Doctor Who been about romance and crap?
|
|
|
|
Post by Master Shake on Jul 22, 2007 1:09:26 GMT
That's a great point DC - Renee thinks that way too. Gotta cater to a modern audience though.  Maybe they'll change the TARDIS into an Apple iFone next season. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Lieutenant Columbo on Jul 22, 2007 9:37:26 GMT
Come on - he's bound to be after a relationship the poor sod - don't be tight... Unless he's always in the lavvy with some ahem 'themed magazines' making his own 'one-handed' entertainment! Derty burger! N. |
|
|
|
Post by Grimly Fiendish on Jul 23, 2007 10:22:12 GMT
Somehow, I can't really see the Doctor doing that... o.O;;
|
|
|
|
Post by Lieutenant Columbo on Jul 23, 2007 20:32:28 GMT
Yes... I used to be an idealist too - and then someone tw*tted me with a 'reality bat' - now I've seen the light, and pretty dim it is too! N. |
|
|
|
Post by Stan Butler on Jul 24, 2007 22:27:08 GMT
I think it's stupid how they've made it so that the companions, both Rose and Martha, were in love with the Doctor. Since when has Doctor Who been about romance and crap? Come on - he's bound to be after a relationship the poor sod - don't be tight... Very true. After all, he's lived a celibate life for over 900 years. |
|
